How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An inward field without a negative-time flow in the half-line
Statement refuted
On , is inward at but has no negative-time flow through staying in the half-line.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The half-line with boundary point and the constant smooth vector field .
In a boundary chart with half-space coordinate increasing into the manifold, a vector is inward exactly when its last coordinate is positive (Inward, outward, and boundary-tangent vectors).
Counterexample
In the identity boundary chart on , the vector has coordinate , so it is inward at by [L1].
Any integral curve through must satisfy and , hence . It lies in for but not for any . Therefore no flow through can be defined for negative time while remaining in the half-line.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ioan Mărcuț, Manifolds (2017 lecture notes), §§14.5, 15.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Will Merry, Differential Geometry (2021), Lecture 24 (standard reference, not scraped)