How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A finite oracle-query transcript
Statement refuted
A computation deciding whether belongs to its oracle must read every bit of that oracle.
Counterexample
Given: an oracle .
The machine that queries only and returns the answer decides this predicate for every oracle . Its transcript has the single query .
Any two oracles agreeing at give exactly the same run and output, even if they differ elsewhere. This finite witness refutes the claimed whole-oracle read.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Sebastiaan Terwijn, Computability Theory, Proposition 5.1.4 (standard reference, not scraped)