How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Sawtooth paths converge uniformly to a line segment while every sawtooth has length and the limit has length
Counterexample
For each integer , let be the polygonal path through
at the corresponding parameters . Then converges uniformly to , but
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The zigzag paths above.
A continuous piecewise- path has length equal to the sum of the integrals of its speeds over the pieces (A continuous piecewise- path is rectifiable and its length is the sum of the speed integrals over its pieces).
The integral of a constant on is (If on then for every partition ; in particular every constant function is integrable, with ).
The sequence of real numbers tends to zero (For every in a complete ordered field there is a natural with ).
Uniform convergence guarantees only (Arc length is lower semicontinuous under uniform convergence of paths).
Verification
Every has first coordinate and second coordinate between and , so by [L3].
On each of the parameter intervals, has derivative or and hence constant speed . By [L1]--[L2], each piece contributes and .
The limit path has constant derivative and speed , so [L1]--[L2] give .
Thus lengths do not converge to the length of the uniform limit. The valid inequality [L4] reads , as expected.
Depends on
- A continuous piecewise-$C^1$ path is rectifiable and its length is the sum of the speed integrals over its pieces
- If $m \le f \le M$ on $[a,b]$ then $m(b-a) \le L(f,P) \le \underline{\int_a^b} f \le \overline{\int_a^b} f \le U(f,P) \le M(b-a)$ for every partition $P$; in particular every constant function is integrable, with $\int_a^b c = c(b-a)$
- Arc length is lower semicontinuous under uniform convergence of paths
- For every $\varepsilon > 0$ in a complete ordered field there is a natural $n \ge 1$ with $1/n < \varepsilon$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 75 results over 19 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Denzler, Calculus of Variations, Section 4.7 (standard reference, not scraped)