How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A Cauchy input has no L2 degree-one polynomial chaos
Statement refuted
Every real probability law supports a degree-one orthonormal polynomial chaos basis.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Cauchy probability law and the finite moment-Gram requirements of Finite product-law polynomial-chaos input data.
Degree one requires the finite second moment and positive-definite monomial Gram matrix of Finite product-law polynomial-chaos input data.
Counterexample
Take the standard Cauchy law, whose density is on . Its second moment integral is For , , so the integral over is at least .
Letting shows the second moment is infinite. Hence , the degree-one monomial Gram entry is not finite, and [F1] fails; the finite Gram--Schmidt construction cannot supply a degree-one chaos basis for this law.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.