How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A completed-product measurable set can have a nonmeasurable exceptional section
Statement refuted
Every section of a completed-product measurable function is measurable.
Counterexample
Let be non-Lebesgue-measurable and let Put .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The function above.
The set is contained in a planar null set, so it becomes measurable after completing the product measure. (A nonmeasurable subset of a null line shows that the product of complete measures need not be complete)
Verification
By [L1], the indicator is measurable for the completed product measure.
The section at is , whose support is not Lebesgue measurable. Hence is not measurable. So completed-product measurability gives section measurability only almost everywhere, not at every parameter.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John K. Hunter, Measure Theory, Example 5.20 (standard reference, not scraped)