Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Conditional convergence of ∑an does not force convergence of ∏(1+an)

Statement refuted

If the series ∑an converges, then the product ∏(1+an) converges.

Counterexample

1.1givenalgebra

The paired partial sums satisfy a2m−1+a2m=1/m2, so the series ∑an converges because ∑m≥11/m2 converges; it is not absolutely convergent because ∑a2m−1=∑1/m diverges.

2.1step 1.1algebra

The paired product is (1+a2m−1)(1+a2m)=(1+1m)(1−1m+1m2)=1−1m+1m2+1m5/2. For all large m this is at most 1−12m.

3.1F1step 2.1algebra∎

Since ∑m≥11/(2m) diverges, [F1] makes ∏m≥M(1−12m) tend to 0 for every large M; step 2.1 therefore forces the product of the paired factors, and hence ∏(1+an) itself, to tend to 0 rather than to a nonzero limit. This refutes the statement.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources