Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Convolution of two tempered distributions need not exist

Statement refuted

Every pair of tempered distributions has an ordinary convolution.

Already on Rn, for n≥1, the two constant tempered distributions 1 and 1 do not have an ordinary convolution.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: n≥1.

[F1]

A function of polynomial growth defines a tempered distribution (Polynomial growth functions define tempered distributions).

[F2]

Convolution is canonically defined when one distribution has compact support; the constants in this example have no compact support (Convolution of distributions when one has compact support).

Counterexample

technique · divergence along the fibers of the addition map
1.1F1F2

The constant function 1 has polynomial growth of order zero, so each factor defines a tempered distribution by [F1]. Neither factor is compactly supported, so [F2] does not itself define their convolution.

1.2choose

Choose a nonnegative ψ∈D(Rn) with c:=∫Rnψ(z) dz>0. The formal distributional convolution pairing would require the following addition-pullback integral.

∫Rn∫Rnψ(x+y) dy dx.

For the cube QR=[−R,R]n, translation in the inner integral gives

∫QR∫Rnψ(x+y) dy dx=∣QR∣c=(2R)nc.

The quantities on the right tend to +∞. Equivalently, ψ(x+y) is not compactly supported on R2n: every nonempty addition fiber has infinite volume. [given, algebra]

2.1F2step 1.2∎

Hence the ordinary integral construction does not produce a finite pairing even on this one nonnegative test function, and 1∗1 is undefined as an ordinary distributional convolution. This does not say that no separately chosen regularization can assign an object to the pair; such an assignment is additional structure, not the ordinary convolution supplied by [F2].

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources