How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Countable levels do not suffice for König’s lemma
Statement refuted
Every height- tree with countable levels has a cofinal branch.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Work in ZF. Let be the set of all finite strictly decreasing sequences of natural numbers, including the empty sequence, ordered by proper initial segment.
Heights are predecessor order types; a cofinal branch has node heights unbounded in the height of the tree. Set-theoretic trees, heights, levels, branches and antichains
A product of two countable sets is countable. A product of two at most countable sets is at most countable
Subsets of countable sets are countable. Every subset of an at most countable set is at most countable
Every nonempty set of natural numbers has a least element. The well-ordering principle
Counterexample
The predecessors of a sequence of length are exactly its restrictions to lengths , in that order. Thus the proper initial-segment relation is transitive and irreflexive, its predecessor orders are finite well-orders, and by F1. The empty sequence is the unique root.
The level is a singleton. For each fixed , the set of length- sequences is countable: start with the singleton and iterate F2 using . Since , F3 makes every level countable. For the explicit sequence has length and lies in . Therefore all finite heights occur and the height is exactly . The first level contains every for , so it is infinite.
If were a cofinal branch, its sequences would be nested and have unbounded lengths by F1. Their union would therefore be a function . For each , take a node in of length at least ; its strict decrease gives . The nonempty range of has a least element by F4, but is a smaller element of the same range, a contradiction. Thus the displayed countable-level tree has no cofinal branch. Its infinitely branching root and infinite first level explain precisely the failure of the finite-level hypothesis.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Monk, Set theory following Jech (2024), Theorem 9.32, printed p86; decreasing-sequence witness supplied locally (standard reference, not scraped)