How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Counting measure on shows the dominating measure needs sigma-finiteness
Statement refuted
Lebesgue measure on has a Radon-Nikodym density with respect to counting measure on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Counting measure on and Lebesgue measure on .
Counting measure is a measure, and for a singleton one has . (Counting measure on an arbitrary set, Counting measure is a measure)
A density representation would mean for every measurable set . (The measure with density relative to )
Counterexample
Suppose for every measurable set . Applying this to a singleton and using [L1] gives Thus pointwise.
Step 1.1 and [L2] then give contradicting the fact that the interval has Lebesgue mass . Therefore no such density exists.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John K. Hunter, Measure Theory, Example 6.23 and Example 6.28 (standard reference, not scraped)