How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Extension by zero without support away from the boundary is not smooth
Statement refuted
Any smooth function on an open set extends smoothly to the ambient manifold by setting it equal to zero outside the open set.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The open set and the smooth function on it.
Smooth extension works only after the support is kept away from the boundary by a cutoff (Smooth extension from a closed neighbourhood).
Counterexample
The naive zero extension is the step function for and for .
The function is not continuous at , so it is not smooth.
Hence the hypothesis singled out in [L1] is essential.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds (standard reference, not scraped)
- Will J. Merry, Differential Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)
- Nigel Hitchin, Differentiable Manifolds (standard reference, not scraped)