Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A finite-mean functional without a square-integrable influence curve

Statement refuted

Every finite-mean law has a finite-variance influence curve for its mean functional in the dominated local model generated by bounded mean-zero score tilts.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The statement above and the definitions of DQM paths and parameter influence curves.

[F1]

A dominated differentiable-in-quadratic-mean submodel: a one-sided common-dominated path is DQM when its square-root density has the stated first-order L2 expansion.

[F2]

Pathwise differentiability and parameter influence curves: a finite-variance parameter influence curve is a vector in L02(P) representing path derivatives by the L2(P) pairing.

[F3]

Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2: ∣P[fg]∣≤∥f∥2∥g∥2 for square-integrable f,g.

[F4]

A uniform derivative bound gives a uniform Taylor remainder bound: if the second derivative is bounded on an interval, the first-order Taylor polynomial has a remainder bounded by a constant times the square of the displacement.

Counterexample

Given: Let X=N≥1, P{j}=2−j, f(j)=2j/2, and ψ(Q)=Qf. Allow all local tilts dPt,s=(1+ts)dP with bounded s satisfying Ps=0.

1.1givenalgebra

The masses sum to one. The geometric series gives Pf=∑j≥12−j/2<∞, while P[f2]=∑j≥11=∞. Thus μ=Pf is finite and u=f−μ is integrable, centered, but not square-integrable.

1.2F1F4givenalgebra

For any bounded centered s, choose t≥0 so small that ∣ts∣≤1/2 everywhere. Then 1+ts≥0 and P(1+ts)=1. On [−1/2,1/2], g(x)=1+x has g′′(x)=−1/(4(1+x)3/2), so ∣g′′(x)∣≤1. [F4] with n=1 gives 1+ts=1+t2s+O(t2∥s∥∞2) uniformly; thus the tilt is DQM with score s. Since f∈L1(P) and s is bounded, ψ(Pt,s)=Pf+tP[fs] and ψ˙P(s)=P[us].

1.3givenalgebra

For M>0, put uM=u1{∣u∣≤M}, cM=PuM, and sM=uM−cM. Then sM is bounded and centered, DM:=P[u21{∣u∣≤M}]=P[usM], and ∥sM∥22=DM−cM2≤DM. For all sufficiently large j, u(j)≥2j/2/2, so each such included atom contributes at least 1/4 to DM; as M→∞, arbitrarily many atoms are included and DM→∞. For large M, sM≠0 because the truncation vanishes on a positive-mass tail and is nonzero on included atoms. Hence ∣ψ˙P(sM)∣/∥sM∥2≥DM→∞.

2.1F2F3step 1.3given∎

If a finite-variance influence curve ϕ∈L02(P) represented these derivatives, [F3] would give ∣ψ˙P(sM)∣=∣P[ϕsM]∣≤∥ϕ∥2∥sM∥2 for every M, contradicting step 1.3. Thus the mean functional has no square-integrable influence curve in this model, refuting the statement.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.