How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A finite-mean functional without a square-integrable influence curve
Statement refuted
Every finite-mean law has a finite-variance influence curve for its mean functional in the dominated local model generated by bounded mean-zero score tilts.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The statement above and the definitions of DQM paths and parameter influence curves.
A dominated differentiable-in-quadratic-mean submodel: a one-sided common-dominated path is DQM when its square-root density has the stated first-order expansion.
Pathwise differentiability and parameter influence curves: a finite-variance parameter influence curve is a vector in representing path derivatives by the pairing.
Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for : for square-integrable .
A uniform derivative bound gives a uniform Taylor remainder bound: if the second derivative is bounded on an interval, the first-order Taylor polynomial has a remainder bounded by a constant times the square of the displacement.
Counterexample
Given: Let , , , and . Allow all local tilts with bounded satisfying .
The masses sum to one. The geometric series gives , while . Thus is finite and is integrable, centered, but not square-integrable.
For any bounded centered , choose so small that everywhere. Then and . On , has , so . [F4] with gives uniformly; thus the tilt is DQM with score . Since and is bounded, and .
For , put , , and . Then is bounded and centered, , and . For all sufficiently large , , so each such included atom contributes at least to ; as , arbitrarily many atoms are included and . For large , because the truncation vanishes on a positive-mass tail and is nonzero on included atoms. Hence .
If a finite-variance influence curve represented these derivatives, [F3] would give for every , contradicting step 1.3. Thus the mean functional has no square-integrable influence curve in this model, refuting the statement.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.