How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The translates of the unit interval converge almost everywhere to zero but not in measure
Statement refuted
almost-everywhere convergence implies convergence in measure on every measure space.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Lebesgue measure on and the sequence .
Almost-everywhere convergence means pointwise convergence off a measurable null set. (Convergence almost everywhere relative to a measure)
Convergence in measure means that for every real , . (Convergence in measure)
Counterexample
Fix . If , then , so . Hence for every , and therefore almost everywhere by [L1].
For every one has , whose Lebesgue measure is . So the bad-set measures do not tend to , and [L2] fails.
This sequence satisfies the premise of the refuted statement and violates its conclusion.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis, 2nd ed., Section 2.4, Example (ii) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Terence Tao, 245A Notes 4: Modes of convergence, Example 4 (standard reference, not scraped)