How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Infinite Ramsey fails with infinitely many colours: colour by
Statement refuted
The finite-colour hypothesis in Infinite Ramsey theorem on : every finite colouring of has an infinite monochromatic set, in ZF may be omitted for pair colourings.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The colouring defined by .
Every finite colouring of has an infinite monochromatic set, in ZF (Infinite Ramsey theorem on : every finite colouring of has an infinite monochromatic set, in ZF).
Counterexample
Every natural occurs as , so this colouring genuinely has infinitely many colours.
If , then while , and these colours differ. Hence no set of size at least three is monochromatic, in particular no infinite set is. This refutes the proposed extension and leaves [L1]'s finite-colour conclusion untouched.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- I. B. Leader, Ramsey Theory, Theorem 4 and canonical left-dependent colouring (standard reference, not scraped)