Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Infinite Ramsey fails with infinitely many colours: colour {i,j} by min⁡{i,j}

Statement refuted

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The colouring c:[N]2→N defined by c({i,j})=min⁡{i,j}.

[L1]

Every finite colouring of [N]k has an infinite monochromatic set, in ZF (Infinite Ramsey theorem on N: every finite colouring of [N]k has an infinite monochromatic set, in ZF).

Counterexample

technique · constructive
1.1

Every natural i occurs as c({i,i+1})=i, so this colouring genuinely has infinitely many colours.

construct
2.1

If a<b<c, then c({a,b})=a while c({b,c})=b, and these colours differ. Hence no set of size at least three is monochromatic, in particular no infinite set is. This refutes the proposed extension and leaves [L1]'s finite-colour conclusion untouched.

step 1.1L1discharge-construct∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources