Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The degenerate constraint x2+y2=0x^2+y^2=0 defeats the multiplier conclusion

Statement refuted

Refuted: every constrained local extremum satisfies f=λg\nabla f=\lambda\nabla g, even when the constraint gradient vanishes.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: g(x,y)=x2+y2g(x,y)=x^2+y^2 and f(x,y)=xf(x,y)=x.

Counterexample

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The constraint set {g=0}\{g=0\} is the singleton (0,0)(0,0), so ff has both a constrained local maximum and a constrained local minimum there.

givenalgebra
1.2

At the origin, g=(0,0)\nabla g=(0,0) while f=(1,0)\nabla f=(1,0).

givenL1algebra
2.1

No scalar λ\lambda can satisfy f(0,0)=λg(0,0)\nabla f(0,0)=\lambda\nabla g(0,0). Thus a regularity hypothesis is necessary for the usual multiplier conclusion.

step 1.1step 1.2algebra

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 51 results over 17 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources