How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Markov's conclusion can fail without nonnegativity
Statement refuted
The conclusion of Markov's inequality remains valid when the hypothesis is removed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The uniform two-point probability space and a random variable taking values and .
Each point in a uniform two-point space has probability (The uniform probability space on a nonempty finite set).
A real random variable and its expectation are a function and its weighted finite sum (Real random variables on finite probability spaces and their finite distributions, Expectation of a real random variable on a finite probability space).
Markov's theorem assumes that is nonnegative (Markov's inequality on a finite probability space).
Counterexample
For the constructed two-valued variable, direct calculation gives .
At threshold , , while .
The purported conclusion would be , which is false. This refutes removal of the nonnegativity hypothesis, not [L3].
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 42 results over 15 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- H. Pishro-Nik, Introduction to Probability, Statistics, and Random Processes, Section 6.2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)