How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Over , a nonconstant polynomial can be a unit and product degree can drop
Statement refuted
For every commutative ring , every unit of is constant and degrees add under multiplication of nonzero polynomials.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The ring and the polynomial .
Over a commutative ring, product degree is at most the sum of the degrees, and the coefficient at that sum is the product of the leading coefficients (Degree inequalities for sums and products over a commutative ring).
The ring is the quotient ring , so in it (For every , the congruence-class ring is the quotient ring ).
Counterexample
In , by [L2], so the nonconstant polynomial is a unit and is its own inverse.
Both factors have degree , but their product has degree ; [L1] permits this drop because the top coefficient is in , so both parts of the statement are refuted.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 37 results over 11 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Neil Donaldson, Math 120B Notes, Section 22, coefficient-ring caveats (standard reference, not scraped)