Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Non-strict convexity allows many minimisers

Statement refuted

Counterexample. On the real Banach space R2 consider I(x,y)=x2. Then I is convex (Convex and strictly convex functionals on a convex subset of a real vector space) and arg min⁡R2I={(0,y):y∈R}, an affine line of minimisers: I≥0 and I(0,y)=0 for every y, while for x≠0, I(x,y)>0. The functional is not strictly convex, so the strictness hypothesis in Strict convexity gives uniqueness of a minimiser is genuinely needed: convexity alone does not force uniqueness of a minimiser.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The functional I:R2→R, I(x,y)=x2, on the real Banach space R2.

[F1]

A function I on a convex set is convex when I(λu+(1−λ)v)≤λI(u)+(1−λ)I(v) for all u,v and λ∈[0,1], and strictly convex when the inequality is strict for u≠v and λ∈(0,1) with finite values (Convex and strictly convex functionals on a convex subset of a real vector space).

[F2]

A proper, strictly convex functional has at most one minimiser on a convex set; in particular at most one finite minimiser (Strict convexity gives uniqueness of a minimiser).

Counterexample

technique · direct verification
1.1F1algebra

I is convex. For u=(x1,y1), v=(x2,y2) and λ∈[0,1] one computes I(λu+(1−λ)v)=(λx1+(1−λ)x2)2 and λI(u)+(1−λ)I(v)=λx12+(1−λ)x22, whose difference is λ(1−λ)(x1−x2)2≥0; hence I is convex by [F1].

1.2algebra

The minimisers. Since I(x,y)=x2≥0 for every (x,y), and x2=0 exactly when x=0, the infimum of I on R2 is 0 and the set of minimisers is exactly the affine line {(0,y):y∈R}.

1.3F1algebra

I is not strictly convex. Take the distinct points u=(0,0) and v=(0,1), which satisfy I(u)=I(v)=0<+∞, and λ=12. Then I(12u+12v)=I(0,12)=0=12I(u)+12I(v), so the strict inequality required by [F1] fails; hence I is not strictly convex.

2.1F2step 1.2step 1.3∎

Uniqueness genuinely needs strictness. The line {(0,y):y∈R} consists of pairwise distinct minimisers of the convex functional I by step 1.2, so convexity alone does not force uniqueness; by [F2] the uniqueness conclusion requires the strict convexity hypothesis, which fails for this functional by step 1.3. This is exactly the sharpness recorded in the statement refuted.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources