How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Non-strict convexity allows many minimisers
Statement refuted
Counterexample. On the real Banach space consider . Then is convex (Convex and strictly convex functionals on a convex subset of a real vector space) and an affine line of minimisers: and for every , while for , . The functional is not strictly convex, so the strictness hypothesis in Strict convexity gives uniqueness of a minimiser is genuinely needed: convexity alone does not force uniqueness of a minimiser.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The functional , , on the real Banach space .
A function on a convex set is convex when for all and , and strictly convex when the inequality is strict for and with finite values (Convex and strictly convex functionals on a convex subset of a real vector space).
A proper, strictly convex functional has at most one minimiser on a convex set; in particular at most one finite minimiser (Strict convexity gives uniqueness of a minimiser).
Counterexample
is convex. For , and one computes and , whose difference is ; hence is convex by [F1].
The minimisers. Since for every , and exactly when , the infimum of on is and the set of minimisers is exactly the affine line .
is not strictly convex. Take the distinct points and , which satisfy , and . Then , so the strict inequality required by [F1] fails; hence is not strictly convex.
Uniqueness genuinely needs strictness. The line consists of pairwise distinct minimisers of the convex functional by step 1.2, so convexity alone does not force uniqueness; by [F2] the uniqueness conclusion requires the strict convexity hypothesis, which fails for this functional by step 1.3. This is exactly the sharpness recorded in the statement refuted.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald Teschl, Partial Differential Equations: From Classical to Modern (2026 author manuscript; complete 392-page archived text) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Riccardo Cristoferi, Calculus of Variations: Lecture Notes, Carnegie Mellon University 2016 (complete 133-page notes) (standard reference, not scraped)