How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
1/sin(1/z) has a nonisolated singularity at 0
Statement refuted
Refuted claim: every singularity at a point of a complex function is automatically isolated.
The witness is
at . The function has poles at points tending to , so the singularity at is not isolated.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The function .
The zeros of sine are exactly the integral multiples of (The zero sets of sine and cosine and the least positive common period 2 pi).
Counterexample
For every positive integer , the point satisfies by [L1], so has a pole at each .
The sequence tends to , so every punctured neighbourhood of contains some pole of . Hence no punctured neighbourhood of is a region on which is holomorphic, and the singularity at is not isolated.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- David Greenfield, Rutgers Math 403 diary (standard reference, not scraped)