How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A bounded bijection of incomplete normed spaces need not be open
Statement refuted
A bounded bijective linear map between arbitrary normed spaces need not be open.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The identity .
Counterexample
Since , is bounded and bijective.
Its inverse is unbounded: for , but .
The target is incomplete by Uniform boundedness fails on the incomplete space c_00. The partial sums of are also Cauchy in the norm but have no limit in , so the domain is incomplete as well.
If were open, its inverse would be continuous at , hence bounded by linearity, contradicting step 1.2.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Buhler--Salamon, Functional Analysis, Example 2.13 (standard reference, not scraped)