Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The disc Poisson integral can miss the assigned value at a jump

Statement refuted

Let g:∂D→{0,1} be g(eit)=1 for 0<t<π and g(eit)=0 for π≤t≤2π, so that g(1)=0. For 0≤r<1 define its bounded-data Poisson integral by Ug(r)=(2π)−1∫02πPr(t)g(eit) dt. Then Ug(r)=1/2 for every r, so Ug(r)→1/2≠g(1) as r↑1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the unit circle boundary datum g above and the disc Poisson kernel.

[F1]

For z=reiϕ∈D and t∈R the Poisson kernel of the unit disc is P(z,eit)=(1−∣z∣2)/∣eit−z∣2; writing z=reiϕ with 0≤r<1 gives P(z,eit)=Pr(t−ϕ) with Pr(θ)=(1−r2)/(1−2rcos⁡θ+r2) (The Poisson kernel on the unit disc).

[F2]

For 0≤r<1 the kernel Pr(θ)=(1−r2)/(1−2rcos⁡θ+r2) satisfies Pr(θ)>0 for every θ and (2π)−1∫02πPr(θ) dθ=1 (The Poisson kernel is positive, has total mass one, and concentrates at a boundary point).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1givenF1F2

Define g(eit):=1 for 0<t<π, g(eit):=0 for π≤t≤2π, and Ug(r):=(2π)−1∫02πPr(t)g(eit) dt for 0≤r<1, with Pr as in [F1]; this integral is finite because g is bounded and the kernel is continuous on the compact circle. Since g(eit) vanishes on [π,2π] and equals one on (0,π), Ug(r)=(2π)−1∫0πPr(t) dt. Also g(1)=g(ei0)=0, because 0 is not an interior point of (0,π).

2.1givenstep 1.1F1algebra

Reflection symmetry. For every t we have cos⁡(2π−t)=cos⁡t, so [F1] gives Pr(2π−t)=Pr(t); the substitution t↦2π−t maps (0,π) onto (π,2π) and preserves the Lebesgue measure. Hence ∫0πPr(t) dt=∫π2πPr(t) dt.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F2algebra

Normalization. By [F2], (2π)−1∫02πPr(θ) dθ=1; splitting the integral at π and using step 2.1, 1=2⋅(2π)−1∫0πPr(t) dt. Therefore Ug(r)=(2π)−1∫0πPr(t) dt=1/2 for every 0≤r<1.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1F1∎

Failure at the jump. The value Ug(r)=1/2 is independent of r, so Ug(r)→1/2 as r↑1, while the datum assigns g(1)=0 at the boundary point ei0=1; thus the Poisson integral of a bounded boundary function need not recover the assigned value at a discontinuity, and only continuity of the datum at the point would force it.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources