How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The polynomial space admits no complete norm
Statement refuted
Refuted claim: the polynomial space over a scalar field can be made into a Banach space by some norm.
Let and let be the polynomial ring of The polynomial ring over a commutative ring as finitely supported coefficient sequences with convolution, regarded as a vector space over . Then no norm on is complete.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A scalar field and the vector space of polynomials in one indeterminate.
A Banach space has no countably infinite Hamel basis (A Banach space has no countably infinite Hamel basis).
A basis is a linearly independent spanning subset (Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis).
The polynomial ring is the set of finite sums (The polynomial ring over a commutative ring as finitely supported coefficient sequences with convolution).
Counterexample
The set spans by [L3], because every polynomial is a finite linear combination of monomials. It is linearly independent: if as a polynomial, then every coefficient is . Hence [L2] makes a countably infinite Hamel basis of .
If some norm on were complete, then [L1] would forbid the countably infinite Hamel basis from step 1.1. This contradiction shows that no norm on is complete.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Christopher Heil, A Basis Theory Primer (standard reference, not scraped)