Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

One uniform phase query gives small trace-distance advantage

Statement refuted

The claim that a uniform address superposition followed by one phase query can find a uniformly unknown marked address with success bounded below by a positive constant for arbitrarily large dyadic N=2n is false. For any address-valued final measurement, its average success over a uniform marked coordinate is at most 1/N+2N−1/N. The calculations below concern exactly that initial state and one phase query; they do not assert a lower bound for algorithms that choose another initial state or query schedule.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A dyadic address count N=2n, a uniform address state on its N basis vectors, the phase oracle for one marked coordinate, and the finite-dimensional trace-distance conventions.

[F1]

Finite marked-item search and its bit oracle: the phase oracle changes the sign of a marked address and fixes each unmarked address.

[F2]

The computational basis is orthonormal: the address vectors ∣0⟩,…,∣N−1⟩ are an orthonormal basis.

[F3]

Dirac Notation Conversion: ∣u⟩⟨v∣z=⟨z,v⟩rootu.

[F4]

A unit-vector outer product is a density operator: a unit vector's rank-one projector is a density operator.

[F5]

Trace Distance: D(ρ,σ)=12∥ρ−σ∥1 for density operators.

[F6]

Pure state trace distance: for unit vectors, D(Pu,Pv)=1−∣⟨u∣v⟩D∣2.

[F7]

Hermitian Trace Norm Positive Negative Parts: for self-adjoint trace-zero X, ∥X∥1=2tr⁡(X+)=2tr⁡(X−).

[F8]

Measurement Variation At Most Trace Distance: the total variation distance between the outcome laws of any finite measurement is at most the trace distance.

[F9]

BBBV hybrid lower bound for unstructured search: distinguishing empty input from an unknown one-marked input requires order-N standard bit queries.

Counterexample

1.1F1F2F4F5F6algebra

Let ∣s⟩=N−1/2∑j=0N−1∣j⟩, Ps=∣s⟩⟨s∣, and let the fixed marked coordinate be i. Its query address is i−1, so the phase query Oi=I−2∣i−1⟩⟨i−1∣ sends s to the unit vector ψi=s−2∣i−1⟩/N because it only flips one basis sign; set Pψi=∣ψi⟩⟨ψi∣. Orthonormality [F2] gives ⟨s,ψi⟩D=1−2/N; [F5]–[F6] give D(Ps,Pψi)=1−(1−2/N)2=2N−1/N=O(N−1/2). This tends to zero with N.

1.2F2F3F4F5F7algebra

Suppose instead the mark is unknown and uniform on {1,…,N}. Each Pψi is a density operator by [F4], so their finite average ρ=N−1∑iPψi is self-adjoint, nonnegative, and trace one. Writing ei=∣i−1⟩, expansion gives Pψi=Ps−2N(∣s⟩⟨ei∣+∣ei⟩⟨s∣)+4N∣ei⟩⟨ei∣. The two cross sums each equal NPs, and ∑i∣ei⟩⟨ei∣=I by [F2]–[F3], so ρ=(1−4/N)Ps+4I/N2. Then X=ρ−Ps has eigenvalue −4(N−1)/N2 on span⁡{s} and 4/N2 on s⊥ of dimension N−1; their sum with multiplicity is zero, so X is trace-zero. Its negative part is X−=(4(N−1)/N2)Ps, whose trace is 4(N−1)/N2 because Ps has trace one. By [F5] and [F7], D(ρ,Ps)=12∥X∥1=4(N−1)/N2=O(N−1). If N=1, s⊥ has dimension zero and the formula gives distance zero.

2.1F8F9step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

Fix an address-valued final measurement, let ri be its probability of output i on Ps, and let pi(i) be its probability of outputting i on Pψi. The event form of [F8] and step 1.1 give pi(i)≤ri+2N−1/N. Since ∑iri≤1, the average success for a uniformly unknown marked coordinate is at most N−1+2N−1/N, which tends to zero. Separately, [F8] and step 1.2 bound the total-variation change between the empty-input law and the uniform-mark mixture law by 4(N−1)/N2, so this specified experiment also has vanishing decision advantage. The lower bound [F9] concerns arbitrary algorithms and is proved independently; it is not inferred from this example.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

50 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources