How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
One uniform phase query gives small trace-distance advantage
Statement refuted
The claim that a uniform address superposition followed by one phase query can find a uniformly unknown marked address with success bounded below by a positive constant for arbitrarily large dyadic is false. For any address-valued final measurement, its average success over a uniform marked coordinate is at most . The calculations below concern exactly that initial state and one phase query; they do not assert a lower bound for algorithms that choose another initial state or query schedule.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A dyadic address count , a uniform address state on its basis vectors, the phase oracle for one marked coordinate, and the finite-dimensional trace-distance conventions.
Finite marked-item search and its bit oracle: the phase oracle changes the sign of a marked address and fixes each unmarked address.
The computational basis is orthonormal: the address vectors are an orthonormal basis.
A unit-vector outer product is a density operator: a unit vector's rank-one projector is a density operator.
Trace Distance: for density operators.
Pure state trace distance: for unit vectors, .
Hermitian Trace Norm Positive Negative Parts: for self-adjoint trace-zero , .
Measurement Variation At Most Trace Distance: the total variation distance between the outcome laws of any finite measurement is at most the trace distance.
BBBV hybrid lower bound for unstructured search: distinguishing empty input from an unknown one-marked input requires order- standard bit queries.
Counterexample
Let , , and let the fixed marked coordinate be . Its query address is , so the phase query sends to the unit vector because it only flips one basis sign; set . Orthonormality [F2] gives ; [F5]–[F6] give . This tends to zero with .
Suppose instead the mark is unknown and uniform on . Each is a density operator by [F4], so their finite average is self-adjoint, nonnegative, and trace one. Writing , expansion gives . The two cross sums each equal , and by [F2]–[F3], so . Then has eigenvalue on and on of dimension ; their sum with multiplicity is zero, so is trace-zero. Its negative part is , whose trace is because has trace one. By [F5] and [F7], . If , has dimension zero and the formula gives distance zero.
Fix an address-valued final measurement, let be its probability of output on , and let be its probability of outputting on . The event form of [F8] and step 1.1 give . Since , the average success for a uniformly unknown marked coordinate is at most , which tends to zero. Separately, [F8] and step 1.2 bound the total-variation change between the empty-input law and the uniform-mark mixture law by , so this specified experiment also has vanishing decision advantage. The lower bound [F9] concerns arbitrary algorithms and is proved independently; it is not inferred from this example.
Depends on
- BBBV hybrid lower bound for unstructured search
- Finite marked-item search and its bit oracle
- Dirac Notation Conversion
- Trace Distance
- Pure state trace distance
- Hermitian Trace Norm Positive Negative Parts
- Measurement Variation At Most Trace Distance
- A unit-vector outer product is a density operator
- The computational basis is orthonormal
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
50 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles H. Bennett, Ethan Bernstein, Gilles Brassard, and Umesh Vazirani, Strengths and Weaknesses of Quantum Computing (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ronald de Wolf, Quantum Computing: Lecture Notes, arXiv:1907.09415v6 (standard reference, not scraped)