How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Equal radii do not determine convergence on the boundary circle
Statement refuted
Two complex power series with the same radius of convergence have the same convergence behaviour at every point of their common boundary circle.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The series and .
Cauchy–Hadamard gives absolute convergence inside the radius, divergence outside it, and no assertion on the boundary (Cauchy-Hadamard for complex power series, including zero and infinite radius).
For real , the real series converges exactly when (The p-series for a real exponent p converges exactly when p is greater than one).
If the terms of a real series do not tend to , that real series diverges (If a series converges then its terms tend to ).
Counterexample
Both coefficient sequences have root limsup , so [L1] gives radius to both series.
At , the first series has constant term sequence and diverges by [L3], while the second converges by [L2] with .
Thus equal radii do not determine even convergence at the boundary point .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 111 results over 15 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.