How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A quine obtained without inspecting its own source file
Statement refuted
The recursion theorem can yield a self-referential program only if the program reads its own literal source file.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The total computable transformer that sends an index to the constant-output program for .
The companion false statement is refuted by the recursion-theorem fixed point construction, by FALSE: the recursion theorem requires source-code access.
Counterexample
Let be the total computable transformer sending an index to the program that ignores its actual input and prints the numeral . No filesystem or source-file query appears in the description of .
By the fixed-point theorem discussed in [L1], there exists an index with . Therefore running program makes it print its own index , even though the construction used only numbering and effective transformation of indices.
This explicit quine is a counterexample to the statement.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.