Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adapted
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The cusp parametrization t↦(t2,t3) is bijective but not an isomorphism

Statement refuted

A bijective morphism of affine varieties need not be an isomorphism.

Let C:=V(v2−u3)⊆Ak2, and define ν:Ak1→C,t↦(t2,t3). Every point of C has the form (a2,a3) for a unique a∈k, so ν is bijection on points.

Its pullback on coordinate rings is k[C]=k[u,v]/(v2−u3)⟶k[t],u↦t2,v↦t3. This homomorphism is injective but not surjective, because t is not in its image. Hence Affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms shows that ν is not an isomorphism.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources