How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The cusp parametrization t mapsto (t^2,t^3) is bijective but not an isomorphism
Statement refuted
A bijective morphism of affine varieties need not be an isomorphism.
Let and define Every point of has the form for a unique , so is bijection on points.
Its pullback on coordinate rings is This homomorphism is injective but not surjective, because is not in its image. Hence Affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms shows that is not an isomorphism.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, Example 3.29(a) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Michael Artin, Notes for a Course in Algebraic Geometry, Example 2.5.7 (standard reference, not scraped)