Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

S3S_3 has trivial center, so the finite pp-group hypothesis in the nontrivial-center theorem is necessary

Statement refuted

False claim. Every nontrivial finite group has nontrivial center.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The symmetric group S3S_3.

[L2]

The conjugacy classes of S3S_3 have sizes 11, 22, and 33, with only the identity class a singleton (The class equation of S3S_3 is 6=1+2+36=1+2+3).

[L3]

A central element commutes with every group element (The center Z(G)Z(G) of a group).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

An element is central exactly when its conjugacy class is a singleton. By [L2], the only such element of S3S_3 is ee, so Z(S3)={e}Z(S_3)=\{e\}.

L2L3
2.1

The group S3S_3 is nontrivial and finite but has trivial center. Thus the false claim fails, and [L1] shows precisely why the pp-group hypothesis cannot be omitted.

step 1.1L1L2

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 44 results over 13 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources