Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Nonisomorphic groups can share the same profinite completion

Statement refuted

If two groups have the same profinite completion, then they are already isomorphic as abstract groups.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The groups G=Z and H=ZQ.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

As in FALSE: isomorphic profinite completions force the original groups to be isomorphic, every finite quotient of H factors through the projection onto Z. Hence G and H have the same finite quotients, namely the finite cyclic groups.

givenalgebra
2.1

Therefore [L1] gives isomorphic profinite completions, both equal to Z^. But G and H are not isomorphic because H contains the divisible subgroup Q and G does not.

L1step 1.1
3.1

This is a concrete counterexample to the statement.

step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources