How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The vortex field is closed but not exact on the punctured plane
Statement refuted
Every closed vector field on a piecewise- path-connected open set is exact.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: On , let
With coordinates indexed from , so that and are , closedness requires , while exactness requires a potential whose gradient is (Exact and closed C1 vector fields).
A gradient line integral is its potential's endpoint increment and is therefore zero on a closed path (The gradient theorem: the line integral of a gradient is the endpoint increment).
On a nonempty open piecewise- path-connected domain, conservativity, path independence, and zero closed-loop integrals are equivalent (Conservative, path-independent, and zero-closed-loop conditions are equivalent).
Vector line integrals use the integrand (Scalar line integrals with respect to arc length and vector-field line integrals).
Sine and cosine have derivatives and and satisfy (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine).
The integral of the constant on is , and (If on then for every partition ; in particular every constant function is integrable, with , Pi as twice the smallest positive zero of cosine).
Counterexample
The rational formulas defining are on . Direct differentiation gives so is closed by [L1].
The punctured plane is piecewise- path-connected: choose a positive radius at least as large as the radii of two given points, join each point outward along its own ray to that circle, and join the resulting points by a circular arc. None of these pieces meets the origin.
On the counterclockwise unit circle , , [L5] gives
By [L4], [L5], and [L6],
If were exact, [L1] would give a potential and [L2] would make the closed-circle integral zero, contradicting step 2.1. Thus is closed but not exact. By [L3] and step 1.2, it is also neither conservative nor path-independent.
The domain is not star-shaped: for any proposed centre , the segment from to passes through the omitted origin.
Depends on
- Exact and closed C1 vector fields
- The gradient theorem: the line integral of a gradient is the endpoint increment
- Conservative, path-independent, and zero-closed-loop conditions are equivalent
- Scalar line integrals with respect to arc length and vector-field line integrals
- The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine
- Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine
- If $m \le f \le M$ on $[a,b]$ then $m(b-a) \le L(f,P) \le \underline{\int_a^b} f \le \overline{\int_a^b} f \le U(f,P) \le M(b-a)$ for every partition $P$; in particular every constant function is integrable, with $\int_a^b c = c(b-a)$
- Pi as twice the smallest positive zero of cosine
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 128 results over 21 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis II, Example 9.3.7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J.-B. Campesato, Poincare Lemma, section 1 (standard reference, not scraped)