How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Zero residue does not imply a removable singularity
Statement refuted
Refuted claim: if , then is a removable singularity of .
The witness is
Its residue at is , but is a pole of order , not a removable singularity.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The function on .
The residue is the coefficient of in the Laurent expansion (The residue of an isolated singularity).
A finite nonzero principal part characterizes a pole (Characterizations of poles).
Counterexample
The Laurent expansion of at is just , so the coefficient of is ; by [L1], .
The same Laurent expansion has finite nonzero principal part , so [L2] makes a pole of order .
Thus has residue at but the singularity is not removable, refuting the claim.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.