How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A chain map between acyclic complexes has an acyclic cone
Statement
If is a chain map and both and are acyclic, then is acyclic.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A chain map between acyclic complexes.
The cone long exact sequence exists (The cone long exact sequence).
Acyclic means vanishing homology in every degree (Exactness of a complex at a degree and acyclic complexes).
Proof
In the cone long exact sequence from [L1], every copy of and is zero by [L2].
Exactness then forces every to vanish as well. Hence the cone is acyclic.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, Chapter 1 of An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)