How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Complete splitting and trivial frobenius
Statement
An unramified nonzero prime p in a finite Galois extension L/K splits completely if and only if its arithmetic Frobenius conjugacy class is the identity class.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The data and hypotheses of the statement.
Frobenius order is residue degree: For finite Galois L/K and nonzero , the arithmetic Frobenius coset has order in D/I. If P is unramified, has the same order in D.
Galois prime decomposition efg: For a finite Galois extension L/K and nonzero prime p, every P above p has the same ramification index e and residue degree f. If there are g such primes, then .
Proof
If p splits completely, all residue degrees are one. The Frobenius order is then one, so every Frobenius element is identity.
Conversely identity Frobenius has order one, so f=1. Unramifiedness gives e=1, and now gives . Thus the factorization has degree-many distinct primes of residue degree one, namely complete splitting.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Chapter 8, p.142, paragraph after Proposition 8.14 (standard reference, not scraped)