How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
In oriented Euclidean three-space, the cross product is
Statement
In with the standard inner product and the standard orientation (the class of the ordered basis ), define the cross product in the oriented orthonormal basis by
Then . Equivalently, with the unit volume form , one has , and is orthogonal to both and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Vectors , the oriented orthonormal basis , and the unit volume form .
In an oriented orthonormal basis, , and the star is characterized by (The Hodge star exists uniquely and is given by the complementary-basis formula in an oriented orthonormal basis).
On , one has because (The Hodge star is an isometry and satisfies on ).
The interior product contracts by (Interior product is the adjoint of exterior multiplication by a vector).
Proof
Every bilinear alternating map is determined by its values on the three pairs : expanding in coordinates, .
By [L1], , , and ; the map is bilinear and alternating because the wedge is and is linear.
The coordinate cross product is bilinear and alternating, and satisfies , , .
By step 1.1, the two bilinear alternating maps of steps 1.2 and 1.3 agree on the three generating pairs, hence agree everywhere: .
The interior-product form: by [L3], , and applying to that expansion collects the coordinates , , , so by step 2.1.
Orthogonality: by the defining relation of [L1] and the square law of [L2], , and , so ; the same argument with gives .
Steps 2.1, 3.1 and 3.2 establish the three equivalent descriptions and the orthogonality.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Reyer Sjamaar, Manifolds and Differential Forms, §2.5 (standard reference, not scraped)