How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A residue-class indicator from character sums
Statement
Let . Then for every integer ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A reduced residue class modulo and an integer .
For unit classes modulo , when and otherwise (Orthogonality relations for Dirichlet characters modulo q).
Proof
If , then every Dirichlet character has , so the sum is , and this matches the fact that cannot be congruent to the reduced class . If , then both and are unit classes modulo and [L1] applies with and .
In the unit case from step 1.1, [L1] gives exactly when , and otherwise. Dividing by yields the indicator formula.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Kiran S. Kedlaya, Notes on Analytic Number Theory, Chapter 4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Leonard Tomczak, Analytic Number Theory, Corollary 4.3 (standard reference, not scraped)