How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Infinitely many pairwise distinguishable prefixes force nonregularity
Statement
Let . If there are infinitely many words in that are pairwise distinguished by suffixes, then is not regular.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A language with infinitely many pairwise distinguishable words.
By Distinguishing words for states and for prefixes, a suffix distinguishes two words exactly when those two words are not Nerode-equivalent.
By A language is regular if and only if its Nerode equivalence has finite index, a regular language has only finitely many Nerode classes.
Proof
If two words are pairwise distinguished by suffixes, then [L1] shows that they lie in distinct Nerode classes.
Therefore the infinitely many given words occupy infinitely many Nerode classes. By [L2], cannot be regular.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jean Gallier and Jocelyn Quaintance, Introduction to the Theory of Computation: Some Notes for CIS511 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Eric Blais, Models of Computation, 20. Nonregular Languages (standard reference, not scraped)