Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Elementary chains and compatible collapses

Statement

A nonempty set-ordinal elementary chain of actual membership structures satisfying Extensionality has a union elementary over every stage, and the union has a transitive collapse. Conjugating the inclusions by stage and union collapses gives coherent elementary embeddings; these are not asserted to be inclusions of the transitive images.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Unions of nonempty elementary chains: Let λ>0 be a set ordinal and (Mα)α<λ an elementary chain of nonempty structures for one finite-arity set signature L. Its union is a set L-structure U, and MαU for every α<λ. No continuity hypothesis on the chain is required.

[F2]

Collapse of elementary membership submodels: Let M be a set with (M,)Extensionality and let X(M,). In ambient ZF, restricted to X is well-founded and extensional. It has a unique transitive collapse π:XXˉ, and the inverse collapse followed by inclusion is an elementary embedding XˉM. Countability is preserved by π.

Proof

Given: A set sequence (Mα)α<λ with λ>0, actual membership, Extensionality and elementary inclusions.

1.1

Let λ>0 and U=α<λMα. F1 gives a set structure with MαU. It satisfies Extensionality because any one stage does and sentences transfer by elementarity. Apply F2 with X=M=U to obtain its collapse π:UUˉ, and similarly obtain πα:MαMˉα for each stage. Their uniqueness permits Replacement to collect these maps.

F1F2given
2.1

Define jαβ=πβιαβπα1 and jα=πιαπα1. The inverse and forward collapses are isomorphisms and the inclusions are elementary, so each composite is elementary by the satisfaction equivalences. Its codomain is the corresponding transitive collapse, not the original carrier.

F2step 1.1
3.1

For αβγ, cancellation gives jβγjαβ=πγιβγ(πβ1πβ)ιαβπα1=jαγ. The same calculation gives jβjαβ=jα, and jαα is the identity. This proves coherence without identifying any composite with a literal inclusion.

step 2.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources