How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A one-sided comparison of two complete norms makes them equivalent
Statement
Assume DC. Let be complete norms on one vector space . If for all and some , then and are equivalent norms (Equivalent norms, and the dictionary with equivalent metrics).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: DC, complete norms on , and .
Proof
The identity is a bounded linear bijection by the assumed inequality.
Both spaces are Banach (Banach space), so Bounded inverse theorem makes bounded: for some .
The two inequalities are precisely equivalence of and .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Teschl, Topics in Real and Functional Analysis, Theorem 4.6 (standard reference, not scraped)