Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + claude-sonnet-5)audited 2026-08-17
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every adjunction induces a comonad on the codomain of its left adjoint

Statement

For an adjunction F:C⇄D:G with unit η and counit ε, the data

H:=FG,ε:H⇒1D,δ:=FηG:H⇒H2

define a comonad on D (Comonad on a category).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An adjunction F⊣G with unit η and counit ε.

[L1]

The adjunction induces the monad (GF,η,GεF) on C (Every adjunction induces a monad on the domain of its left adjoint).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1

Apply [L1] to the opposite adjunction Gop⊣Fop. Reversing arrows translates its endofunctor FopGop, unit, and multiplication into FG, ε, and FηG on D.

2.1step 1.1∎

The translated associativity equation is Hδ∘δ=δH∘δ, and the translated unit equations are Hε∘δ=1H=εH∘δ; these are precisely coassociativity and the two counit laws, so the displayed data form a comonad.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources