How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every adjunction induces a comonad on the codomain of its left adjoint
Statement
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An adjunction with unit and counit .
The adjunction induces the monad on (Every adjunction induces a monad on the domain of its left adjoint).
Proof
Apply [L1] to the opposite adjunction . Reversing arrows translates its endofunctor , unit, and multiplication into , , and on .
The translated associativity equation is , and the translated unit equations are ; these are precisely coassociativity and the two counit laws, so the displayed data form a comonad.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- E. Riehl, Category Theory in Context, 2nd ed., Lemma 5.1.3 and Definition 5.1.6 (standard reference, not scraped)