Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rational functions with poles bounded at one point

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Riemann-Roch, proper-functions and curve suppliers below. Let k be a field, let C be a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over k (Curves over a field) with genus g=g(C) (Genus via the Euler characteristic), and let p∈C be a closed point of residue degree d=[κ(p):k]≥1 (Degree divisor proper curve). Closed points of C exist: the curve is nonempty of chain dimension one, so besides its unique generic point it contains a point, and every such point is closed (Proper closed subsets of a curve are finite). For every integer n≥1 with nd+1−g≥2 there is a function f∈L(np) that is not constant (The space L(D)). Every such f is nonconstant, every pole of f lies at p and has order at most n, and the pole divisor (f)∞ of Order codimension one rational function is a nonzero effective divisor supported at p (Divisor support positive negative parts); in particular f has at least one pole at p.

The identification L(D)=H0(C,OC(D)) and the sheaf OC(D) use the current interfaces Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor, Rational sections of line bundles are Cartier divisors and Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve, inherited through The Riemann inequality.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k, a smooth proper geometrically integral curve C over k with genus g=g(C), a closed point p∈C of residue degree d=[κ(p):k], and an integer n≥1 with nd+1−g≥2.

[F1]

Curve and closed points: C is nonempty, geometrically integral, separated, of finite type and of chain dimension one over k; its underlying space is Noetherian, it has a unique generic point ηC, and every point x≠ηC is a closed point of C (Curves over a field, Proper closed subsets of a curve are finite). Since chain dimension one means that there is a strict chain of two nonempty irreducible closed subsets, C has at least two points, hence a point different from ηC, and therefore at least one closed point.

[F2]

Divisor and degree: a divisor on C is a finite formal integral combination of closed points, and for a closed point x the residue field κ(x) is finite over k with [κ(x):k]≥1 and deg⁡k([x])=[κ(x):k] (Divisors on a smooth proper curve, Degree divisor proper curve).

[F3]

The Riemann-Roch space: for a divisor D on C with function field k(C), L(D)={f∈k(C)×:div⁡(f)+D≥0}∪{0} is a k-subspace of k(C), where div⁡(f)=∑xord⁡x(f)[x] uses the order of vanishing at each closed point; L(D) is a k-vector space with dim⁡kL(D)=l(D)=h0(D) and l is a nonnegative integer (The space L(D), Order codimension one rational function, The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D)).

[F4]

The Riemann inequality: l(D)≥deg⁡k(D)+1−g for every divisor D; for D=np this gives l(np)≥nd+1−g≥2 by the hypothesis on n, using deg⁡k(np)=nd from [F2] (The Riemann inequality, Degree divisor proper curve).

[F5]

Constants: H0(C,OC) is canonically k, and for every effective divisor D≥0 each nonzero constant c∈k× has div⁡(c)=0, while 0∈L(D) by definition; hence k⋅1⊆L(D); every f∈L(0) is constant, since a nonzero such f has div⁡(f)≥0 and hence is regular everywhere, and zero is constant (Functions on a proper curve, The space L(D), The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D)).

[F6]

The dimension of a k-vector space: if dim⁡kV=m>1 and W⊆V is a subspace of dimension one, then W≠V and there is v∈V∖W; dimensions of vector spaces are compared by inclusion and equality (Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension dim⁡FV; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis).

[F7]

The current interfaces Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor, Rational sections of line bundles are Cartier divisors and Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve supply OC(D) and the identification L(D)=H0(C,OC(D)); the use of l and the inequality below is inherited from [F4].

[F8]

The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the curve, divisor, dimension, Riemann-inequality and proper-functions suppliers recorded in [F1]-[F7]; choosing a single function outside the constants needs no additional choice principle (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct; find a closed point, use the Riemann inequality to make $L(np)$ at least two-dimensional, take a function outside the one-dimensional space of constants, and read the pole conditions off the membership in $L(np)$
1.1F1F2

Existence of closed points and the residue degree. By [F1] the curve C is nonempty with a unique generic point ηC, and its chain dimension one provides a strict chain of two nonempty irreducible closed subsets, so C has at least two points and we may fix a point p0≠ηC; by [F1] every point other than ηC is closed, so p0 is a closed point of C. In particular closed points exist, and for every closed point x, such as the given p, the residue field is finite over k with [κ(x):k]≥1 by [F2]; the given residue degree is d=[κ(p):k]≥1.

1.2F2F3F4

The dimension bound. By [F4] applied to the divisor np, whose degree is deg⁡k(np)=nd by [F2], one has l(np)≥nd+1−g≥2; by [F3] the integer l(np) is the k-dimension of L(np), so L(np) is a k-vector space of dimension at least two.

2.1F3F5F6step 1.2

A nonconstant function with poles only at p. By [F5] the constants form the subspace k⋅1⊆L(np) of dimension one; since dim⁡kL(np)≥2>1, [F6] provides f∈L(np) with f∉k⋅1, so f is not a constant function. By [F3] membership f∈L(np) means div⁡(f)+np≥0, so ord⁡x(f)≥0 for every closed point x≠p and ord⁡p(f)≥−n; that is, every pole of f lies at p with order at most n.

3.1F3F5step 2.1

f has a pole, and the pole divisor. Since f is nonconstant by step 2.1, f∉L(0): otherwise div⁡(f)≥0 and [F5] would exhibit f as a constant. Hence some order ord⁡x(f) is negative; by step 2.1 the only point where this can happen is p, so f has a pole at p. Therefore the pole divisor (f)∞=∑ord⁡x(f)<0(−ord⁡x(f))[x] is a nonzero effective divisor supported at p, with coefficient −ord⁡p(f) between 1 and n.

4.1F1F4F5F7F8step 2.1step 3.1∎

Conclusion and choice accounting. For the given closed point p and every n≥1 with nd+1−g≥2, steps 2.1 and 3.1 produce f∈L(np) that is nonconstant, has all its poles at p of order at most n, and has at least one pole there; moreover every f∈L(np)∖k⋅1 has the same properties by steps 2.1 and 3.1 applied to it. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the suppliers recorded in [F8], including the divisor and dimension interfaces [F2], [F3], [F6], [F7]; choosing the single function f outside the one-dimensional subspace k⋅1 is a single selection from a nonempty set and needs no choice principle, and the flagged dictionary [F7] records the inherited obligation on OC(D).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

94 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources