Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The tail-flip symmetric model has no free ultrafilter on omega

Statement

Every ultrafilter on ω in Ftf is principal. In particular, the tail-flip symmetric model has no free ultrafilter on ω.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An ultrafilter U on ω in Ftf.

[F1]

Every prime ideal on the power set of omega is principal in the tail-flip symmetric model proves that every prime ideal of P(ω) in the model is principal.

[F2]

Ultrafilter defines U as a maximal proper filter and defines principal and free ultrafilters.

Proof

technique · direct Boolean complementation duality
1.1

First, maximality makes U decide every Aω: if neither A nor ωA belonged to U, then every BU would meet A (otherwise upward closure would put ωA in U), so the filter generated by U{A} would be a proper strict extension, contradicting F2. Thus exactly one of A and its complement lies in U, since a proper filter cannot contain both.

F2
2.1

Define I={Aω:ωAU}. Complementation converts upward closure to downward closure and intersections to unions, so I is a proper ideal. If ABI, then (ωA)(ωB)U. Were neither complement in U, step 1.1 would put both A and B in U, and then ABU, a contradiction. Hence AI or BI, so I is prime.

F2step 1.1
3.1

By F1 the ideal I is generated by some Cω, so I={Aω:AC}. Propriety gives Cω. Choose kωC. Since I is prime and {k}(ω{k})=I, while {k}C, we have ω{k}I and hence ω{k}C. Together with kC, this gives C=ω{k} and therefore I={Aω:kA}. For every Bω, it follows that BU iff ωBI iff kB. Thus U is the principal ultrafilter at k in the sense of F2. Since U was arbitrary, no free ultrafilter on ω exists in the model.

F1F2step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources