How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For a trivial action, first cohomology is Hom
Statement
If acts trivially on an abelian group , then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A trivial action of on an abelian group .
The crossed-homomorphism model computes (The inhomogeneous one-cocycle model agrees with crossed homomorphisms in degree one).
A group homomorphism is characterized by in additive notation (Monoid homomorphism and group homomorphism).
Proof
Under the trivial action, the crossed-homomorphism identity becomes , which is exactly the homomorphism law of [L2]. So crossed homomorphisms are precisely the homomorphisms .
Principal crossed homomorphisms are all zero, because for every and . Therefore the quotient is just the group of homomorphisms from step 1.1.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- David A. Craven, Finite Group Theory (standard reference, not scraped)