Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The maximum matching from XX has size XmaxSX(SN(S))|X|-\max_{S\subseteq X}(|S|-|N(S)|)

Statement

Let (X,Y)(X,Y) be a finite bipartite graph and put d:=maxSX(SN(S)).d:=\max_{S\subseteq X}\bigl(|S|-|N(S)|\bigr). Then the greatest number of vertices of XX saturable by a matching is Xd|X|-d.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite bipartite graph with parts (X,Y)(X,Y) and the displayed dd.

[L1]

Hall's theorem supplies a matching saturating a finite left part exactly under Hall's inequalities (Hall's marriage theorem for a finite bipartite graph).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Any matching saturating rr vertices of XX leaves at least SN(S)|S|-|N(S)| vertices of every SXS\subseteq X unmatched, so rXdr\le|X|-d.

given
1.2

Adjoin dd new right vertices, adjacent to every xXx\in X; then every SXS\subseteq X has at least N(S)+dS|N(S)|+d\ge|S| neighbours, so [L1] gives a matching saturating XX in the enlarged graph.

L1
2.1

At most dd of its matching edges use new vertices, so deleting those edges leaves a matching of the original graph saturating at least Xd|X|-d vertices of XX.

step 1.2
3.1

The upper bound in step 1.1 and lower bound in step 2.1 establish the formula.

step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 21 results over 13 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources