Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Hopf--Lax operator is a contraction in the supremum norm

Statement

Let H:Rn→R be convex and superlinear with Legendre transform L, and let u0,v0:Rn→R be bounded. Then for every t≥0 and every x∈Rn ∣Qtu0(x)−Qtv0(x)∣≤sup⁡Rn∣u0−v0∣, and consequently sup⁡Rn∣Qtu0−Qtv0∣≤∥u0−v0∥∞; both Qtu0 and Qtv0 are real-valued (see the proof for the explicit finiteness argument). No uniform continuity of the data is needed for this particular estimate, and no choice principle is used.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A convex superlinear H:Rn→R, its Legendre transform L(v)=sup⁡p(p⋅v−H(p)), bounded data u0,v0:Rn→R, the operators Qt of The Hopf--Lax operator and the Hopf--Lax formula, and c:=sup⁡Rn∣u0−v0∣∈[0,∞).

[F1]

For t>0 and x∈Rn, Qtu0(x)=inf⁡y∈Rn{u0(y)+tL((x−y)/t)} and Qtv0(x)=inf⁡y∈Rn{v0(y)+tL((x−y)/t)}, with infima computed in R∪{+∞}; for t=0, Q0u0=u0 and Q0v0=v0 (The Hopf--Lax operator and the Hopf--Lax formula).

[F2]

L(v)=sup⁡p∈Rn(p⋅v−H(p)) for every v, so L(v)≥−H(0) and L(v) is the least upper bound of {p⋅v−H(p):p∈Rn} (The Legendre transform of a finite-valued convex Hamiltonian).

[F3]

Every convex function on an open convex set is continuous; in particular H is continuous on Rn (A convex function on an open convex set is continuous).

[F4]

A nonempty subset of Rn is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and every continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact subset attains a maximum and a minimum there (For a nonempty subset of Rn with n≥1, compactness, closedness and boundedness, pseudocompactness, and attainment of extrema by every continuous real-valued function are equivalent).

Proof

technique · compare the two infima termwise, then record the finiteness of the Lagrangian values
1.1F1F2F3F4algebra

The Lagrangian values and Hopf--Lax values are real. Fix v∈Rn. The lower bound L(v)≥−H(0) is [F2]. For the upper bound, superlinearity of H gives R>0 with H(p)≥2∣v∣ ∣p∣ whenever ∣p∣≥R; then p⋅v−H(p)≤∣v∣ ∣p∣−2∣v∣ ∣p∣≤0 for such p. On the closed ball B‾(0,R), which is nonempty, closed and bounded and hence compact by [F4], the continuous function p↦p⋅v−H(p) (continuity of H is [F3]) attains a maximum Mv<∞ by [F4]. Therefore p⋅v−H(p)≤max⁡{Mv,0}<∞ for every p, so the least upper bound L(v) of [F2] is real. For t>0, every Hopf--Lax term is bounded below by inf⁡u0−tH(0), and the competitor y=x gives the finite upper bound Qtu0(x)≤u0(x)+tL(0); hence Qtu0(x)∈R, and likewise for v0.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

One-sided comparison for t>0. Fix x and t>0, and write a(y):=u0(y)+tL((x−y)/t) and b(y):=v0(y)+tL((x−y)/t). By step 1.1 and [F2], b is real-valued, bounded below by inf⁡v0−tH(0), and has a finite value at y=x, so m:=inf⁡yb(y)=Qtv0(x) is real. Since u0(y)≤v0(y)+c, we have a(y)≤b(y)+c for every y. For each ε>0, the infimum property gives a y with b(y)<m+ε, and then Qtu0(x)=inf⁡ya(y)≤a(y)≤b(y)+c<m+c+ε. Letting ε↓0 gives Qtu0(x)≤Qtv0(x)+c.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F1∎

Conclusion. Fix t>0 and x. Applying step 2.1 to (u0,v0) and to (v0,u0), whose value of c is unchanged, gives both one-sided inequalities; the Hopf--Lax values are real by step 1.1, so ∣Qtu0(x)−Qtv0(x)∣≤c. For t=0 this is ∣u0(x)−v0(x)∣≤c by [F1]. Taking the supremum over x gives sup⁡∣Qtu0−Qtv0∣≤c=∥u0−v0∥∞.

Remarks

  • Hypotheses actually used. Only convexity, superlinearity, boundedness of the data and the algebraic form of the infimum enter; uniform continuity and the localisation lemma are not needed for this estimate. The argument also shows L is real-valued under superlinearity, a fact used independently in Finiteness, superlinearity of the Lagrangian and localisation of Hopf--Lax near-minimisers.
  • Sharpness. The constant 1 is optimal: for t>0 constant data are preserved by Qt up to the same constant, so the operator is nonexpansive and no smaller universal constant can hold.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources