How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Koszul Homology Localises
Statement
Let be a commutative unital ring, let be an -module, let be a finite sequence in , and let be a multiplicative subset. For every , .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The rings, finite sequences, modules, and local hypotheses stated in the claim. The declared prerequisites used here are Koszul Complex Localises Termwise, Localisation of modules is exact.
Proof
Exact localization commutes with the kernel/image quotient defining homology.
The termwise localization chain isomorphism identifies the result with the claimed localized Koszul homology.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Koszul complexes and regular sequences (standard reference, not scraped)