Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Levi factors are noncanonical but conjugate

Statement

Levi factors need not be equal, but every Levi factor is isomorphic to the quotient by the radical, and any two are conjugate by inner unipotent automorphisms generated by elements of the nilradical.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite-dimensional characteristic-zero Lie algebra and two Levi factors.

[L1]

Malcev conjugacy supplies a finite product of exp(adx) with x in the nilradical (Malcev conjugacy of Levi subalgebras).

[L2]

The semidirect product sV has bracket [(x,u),(y,v)]=([x,y],xvyu) when V is an abelian s-module (Semidirect products of Lie algebras).

[L3]

The radical is the largest solvable ideal (Solvable radical).

[L4]

In characteristic zero, nondegeneracy of the Killing form characterizes semisimplicity (Cartan's semisimplicity criterion).

Proof

technique · unpack the definitions and theorem
1.1

Projection to g/rad(g) restricts to an injective map on a Levi factor because the intersection is zero, and to a surjective map because the two subspaces sum to g. It is a Lie homomorphism, so every Levi factor is isomorphic to the quotient.

algebra
2.1

By [L1], any two factors are related by the stated finite product. Each adx is nilpotent in the proof of [L1], so its exponential is unipotent and is inner in the Lie-algebra sense. When the radical is zero, the sole factor is g and the empty product suffices.

L1step 1.1
3.1

To witness literal nonuniqueness, let s=sl2(k) act in the standard way on V=k2 and put g=sV. For the usual basis h,e,f of s, direct calculation gives K(h,h)=8, K(e,f)=K(f,e)=4, and all other basis pairings zero; the Killing matrix has determinant 1280, so [L4] makes s semisimple. By [L2], V is an abelian ideal and g/Vs. Hence [L3] gives Vrad(g), while the image of the radical in the semisimple quotient is a solvable ideal and is zero; thus the radical is exactly V and s0=s0 is a Levi factor. Take v=(1,0)T and x=f, so xv=(0,1)T0. Formula [L2] gives (ad(0,v))2=0 and exp(ad(0,v))(x,0)=(x,xv)s0. Therefore s1=exp(ad(0,v))(s0) is a distinct Levi factor, proving the first sentence rather than merely referring to a later example.

L2L3L4algebra

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources