How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Maximal subgroups of a finite -group are the inverse images of Frattini hyperplanes
Statement
Let be the quotient map. The maximal subgroups (Maximal proper subgroups) of a finite -group are exactly the inverse images of codimension-one subgroups of . Equivalently, they are the subgroups
for nonzero -linear homomorphisms (Monoid homomorphism and group homomorphism).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite -group and quotient map .
The Frattini subgroup is the intersection of the maximal proper subgroups, so for every maximal subgroup (The Frattini subgroup as the intersection of the maximal subgroups of a finite group).
The quotient is elementary abelian (The Frattini quotient is the largest elementary abelian quotient of a finite -group).
Every independent subset extends to a basis, every spanning subset contains a basis, and all bases have equal finite size (Finite elementary abelian -groups have bases, basis extension, and a well-defined dimension, -spanning sets, independence, and bases in an elementary abelian -group).
Subgroups of correspond inclusion-preservingly to subgroups of containing (Correspondence theorem: subgroups of correspond to subgroups of containing , with normality preserved).
Proof
If is maximal in , [F1] and [L3] make maximal proper in . Choose a basis of this subgroup and extend it by [L2] to a basis of . Maximality permits exactly one added basis vector, since two would create a proper intermediate span. Thus has codimension one.
The coordinate of the omitted basis vector defines a nonzero linear homomorphism whose kernel is . Conversely, let be linear and nonzero and choose with . Every splits as with the first summand in , and , so a basis of together with spans and is independent; it is therefore a basis of by [L2], and has codimension one. Any subgroup strictly between and would contain some with and hence a scalar multiple of equal to modulo , so it would be all of ; thus is maximal proper and [L3] makes its inverse image maximal in .
The quotient and inverse-image maps in [L3] are inverse, so steps 1.1 and 2.1 give the stated classification. The trivial group has neither maximal subgroups nor nonzero linear homomorphisms.
Depends on
- The Frattini quotient is the largest elementary abelian quotient of a finite $p$-group
- The Frattini subgroup $\Phi(G)$ as the intersection of the maximal subgroups of a finite group
- $\mathbb F_p$-spanning sets, independence, and bases in an elementary abelian $p$-group
- Finite elementary abelian $p$-groups have bases, basis extension, and a well-defined dimension
- Correspondence theorem: subgroups of $G/N$ correspond to subgroups of $G$ containing $N$, with normality preserved
- Maximal proper subgroups
- Monoid homomorphism and group homomorphism
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- D. A. Craven, The Theory of p-Groups, §2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- M. van Beek, Topics in Finite p-Groups, §3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)