How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every finite simple graph of minimum degree at least two contains a cycle
Statement
If is a finite simple graph with , then contains a cycle.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite simple graph with .
contains a path with at least edges (Every nonempty finite simple graph contains a path with at least edges).
A closed walk of length at least whose vertices before the final repeated endpoint are distinct is a cycle (Walks, closed walks, trails, paths and cycles, with length equal to the number of traversed edges).
Proof
By [L1], has a path of length at least . Among all paths choose one of greatest length, say , so .
Every neighbour of lies on , since a neighbour outside could be prepended to make a longer path. Since , besides there is a neighbour with .
The list is a closed walk of length with distinct vertices before its final , so it is a cycle by [F1].
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 12 results over 10 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Cornell Mathematics, Graph Theory notes (standard reference, not scraped)