How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Motion of a completely integrable Hamiltonian is linear on invariant tori
Statement
In action–angle coordinates, if then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Action–angle coordinates near an invariant Liouville torus and a Hamiltonian .
The convention defines the Hamiltonian vector field. Hamiltonian vector field and Hamiltonian function.
Proof
The supplied equality says that has no dependence. Write . Since , contraction gives . Comparing this with by [F1] yields and .
The action values are constant, so the vector is constant along the orbit. Integrating on gives the displayed linear motion.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Eckhard Meinrenken, Symplectic Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)