How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
One-sample natural error in the Gaussian model
Statement
Assume AC. Let be an integer, let satisfy , let , and let satisfy . Draw one training pair from the two-class spherical Gaussian model with parameters . Set and define the unit vector for and for . Define when and otherwise, and define its natural error by . Then
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.
Assume the Axiom of Choice, used by the Gaussian-law and concentration suppliers. The Axiom of Choice.
For a one-sample Gaussian model pair, the class-weighted direction satisfies except with probability at most . Signal alignment of a Gaussian sample mean.
For every unit , conditional on is ; scalar normal laws have their stated characteristic functions, affine transformations preserve the characteristic-function formula, and equal characteristic functions determine equal scalar laws under AC. Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance, Characteristic function of a normal law, Characteristic functions under affine maps and independent sums, Uniqueness of a law from its characteristic function.
If and , then ; the centered normal law is symmetric about zero. Gaussian vector norm and maximum-coordinate tails, Characteristic function of a normal law, Uniqueness of a law from its characteristic function.
Proof
Apply [F1] with . With probability at least over the training pair, the learned unit vector satisfies .
Fix any unit vector with . Conditional on , the characteristic function of at is by [F2], independently of . Thus the signed test margin has law . The tie convention implies , so [F3] gives .
If , then and symmetry of the centered normal in [F3] gives .
Suppose and put . By [F4], . Since , the hypothesis gives and . Therefore , where the final strict inequality follows from . Hence , and step 1.2 gives .
On the alignment event in step 1.1, the unit vector meets the hypothesis of step 1.2. Steps 2.1 and 2.2 cover the two exhaustive cases for , so its natural error is at most throughout that event. The event probability from step 1.1 is the asserted lower bound.
References
Signal alignment of a Gaussian sample mean: supplies the one-sample direction bound.
Gaussian vector norm and maximum-coordinate tails: supplies the one-sided Gaussian projection tail used for test error.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Two-class spherical Gaussian model
- Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance
- Characteristic functions under affine maps and independent sums
- Characteristic function of a normal law
- Uniqueness of a law from its characteristic function
- Signal alignment of a Gaussian sample mean
- Gaussian vector norm and maximum-coordinate tails
- The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function
- Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm
- The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.