How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A transitive action on more than one point is primitive exactly when a point stabilizer is maximal
Statement
Let act transitively on with , and fix . Then the action is primitive if and only if the point stabilizer is a maximal proper subgroup of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A transitive action of on with and a point .
A transitive action is primitive exactly when every block is either a singleton or the whole set (Primitive and imprimitive transitive actions).
Blocks containing correspond bijectively to subgroups with , by and (Blocks containing a point correspond to intermediate subgroups).
Proof
Because , choose with . Transitivity gives with , so . Hence is a proper subgroup of .
For the converse direction, suppose is maximal proper. Let be a block containing . By [L2], the corresponding subgroup satisfies , so maximality gives or . The first case gives and the second gives by [L2]. Hence every block containing is trivial.
Let be any block and choose . By transitivity, choose with . Then is a block containing , so step 1.2 makes it either or . Applying shows that is respectively a singleton or . Hence the action is primitive by [L1].
For the forward direction, suppose the action is primitive. By [L2], any subgroup with corresponds to a block containing . By [L1], that block is either or , so [L2] forces or . Together with step 1.1, this makes maximal proper.
Step 2.2 proves that primitivity implies maximality, while steps 1.2 and 2.1 prove the converse.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Group Theory, Chapter 4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- K. Conrad, Transitive Group Actions (standard reference, not scraped)