How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Short exact sequences of numerable vector bundles split
Statement
Assume AC. If is a short exact sequence of finite-rank real or complex vector bundles over a paracompact Hausdorff base, then over the base. More generally, it suffices that have a supplied bundle metric. The splitting need not be canonical.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The short exact sequence and base hypotheses in the statement.
Short exactness includes the local subbundle structure on and fiberwise exactness of (Bundle maps, sections, subbundles, and isomorphisms).
Under AC a finite-rank bundle over a paracompact Hausdorff base has a bundle metric; with a supplied numeration the metric construction is choice-free (Numerable vector bundles admit bundle metrics).
Proof
Use [A1] to give a metric, or use the metric supplied in the more general clause. Let . In a local frame adapted to the subbundle , the Gram matrix is continuous and positive definite; solving the finite linear equations expresses as the graph of a continuous linear map. Hence is a vector subbundle of rank .
On every fiber, . Exactness in [F1] gives , so is injective and, by equal finite dimensions, bijective. In the local graph frames its matrix and inverse vary continuously, hence is a bundle isomorphism.
The map , , is a bundle isomorphism by the local direct-sum frames. Composing its summand with yields . The result depends on the chosen metric, so no canonical splitting is asserted.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher, Vector Bundles & K-Theory, §1.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- MIT 18.906 notes, Lecture 16 (standard reference, not scraped)